From the MTA President: January 2006
We’re only two weeks into January and already the list of concerns continues:
- Quarterly Assessments: Directly on the heels of State Assessments and Regents—does this make sense??? We want our students to be active, engaged, and eager to come to school, correct? How can we expect that to occur when right after the state has tested them to death, we follow suit!
- MAPS—Middletown Assessment of Primary Students: What a mess! Far too many mistakes. Who proofreads? If we sent anything out that looked like this we would be called to task!
- Bi-lingual MAPS: Ditto the above
- HS Construction: Why doesn’t anyone listen to what the staff is saying? Were we not out in front with all of this via a paid newspaper ad back in the fall? How long will heads remain buried in the sand? Kerosene leak? What kerosene leak? (At the Jan. 5th BOE meeting it was revealed that board members had never been informed of this major mishap.)
- Negotiations Impasse: We talk to each other. Do they talk to each other?
- Class Link: Where did this come from? How will this benefit staff and students? As stated at a few building trainings–“Students may access this at home.” Hello! Do the presenters have any idea about our student population and the corresponding poverty levels?
- Scoring Leaders: Way too close to Turnkeys? We’re collecting the documentation regarding exactly what is transpiring because this is grievance territory!
- Training, Training, Training: Why? Why so much? Why the multitude of various programs all at once? Why couldn’t there have been better planning? How about just planning? At last count there were over 15 different district initiatives requiring varying amounts of training.
- Lack of Subs: Maybe if we could be in our classrooms a bit more and have some of that good old quality contact time with our students there wouldn’t be this problem.
- Computer Technology: Again, and again and again I ask: So how are we better off now than we were last year? And…the answer is a resounding—“We’re not!!!” This is a major loss, and it is a major embarrassment to have fallen so far from what we had—something that really worked for our students.
- Inconsistent District-Wide Communication: Who’s on first? Does anyone talk to anyone else? Why all the late notices for meetings and trainings? Where’s the Literacy Coordinator? What about a House Principal for the HS? Will there be an Executive Principal for the HS by the next school year? Where is the consistency of communication among buildings?
In closing, I would like to comment on a remark made by the vice-president of the Board of Education on Thursday, January 5th. In response to detailed information about the multitude of problems being experienced during the HS re-construction, Mrs. Botti stated that “When this is over and done with no one will remember this.” I beg to differ! I am quite certain that everyone and anyone who cares will remember this year. Not only will everyone remember the high school debacle of ’05-‘06 (Cross Pointe, lack of a master schedule, executive principal resignation, etc.), but I fear they will also remember all of the concerns detailed above and we will face unprecedented resignations. Out of 518 MTA members we have 300 who have only been here since 1998! What is this district going to do to prove that they are willing to not just listen, but to also hear the concerns before them? The MTA offered to meet with the BOE on May 5, 2005—we’re still waiting.
In June 2003, a National Labor Relations Board administrative law judge found Wal-Mart violated federal labor laws in 2000 by refusing to bargain over job changes it imposed on meat cutters in a Jacksonville, Texas, store after they voted for union representation. The skilled meat cutters were suddenly demoted to “sales associates” and all Wal-Mart stores eventually shifted to selling pre-cut meat.

